Even before they were written.
I didnt create the sexes, sirah. Yes, a man can have all the sex he wants without personal consequences.
Emails, texts, pictures and group outings. Basically she doesn't want to hear about it
She actually threatened an investigator.
I agree with you, a basic human right and no one should get in the way. Not government, not religion, no one.
It depends on the dress length and the situation.
Um... Context. Context. Context.
When did I say that I believe in anything? I am an atheist, what I believe is not derived from an ancient book of mythology. Its about the here and now. In other words REALITY. Look up the word wise before using it.
no, but you said scientists said there was nothing before the big bang.
The you could admit genocide, rape, slavery are immoral. The question becomes how do we know its immoral?
And God didn?t coin the phrase ?Trinity? in the Bible. It was the Catholics who drew that conclusion after reading the Bible. Likewise, the atheists? Bible, ?On the Origin of Species? caused the atheists to draw the conclusion about Survival of the Fittest based on Darwin?s mechanical explainarion of how life evolves. Darwin implies it just as he implies my paraphrasing of ?because Evolution, no god?.
Not sure why you think that's an argument for
No. Local paper is a joke. I am talking to you on my phone. Many articles have pics from 2014 not 2018. If you can?t show some pics you are full of crap. Did you see the cover of time?
And you guys say you know the bible...
Actually what it seems like is your are grasping for straws, the reasons are clear, and been discussed fully - you simply want to gloss over the answers so you can maintain your smug prejudices, enjoy them!
Help myself from what?
This is a legit excuse, imo.
Working for Scumbag Trump is not a protected class.
I'll let JPS(S) reply for herself, but i can't help inserting my personal reply over here :
Who is the author?
If you live near the American eastern region, you might want to actually check out a Unitarian Universalist congregation. None are strictly Christian, but the eastern congregations lean much more Christian than UU churches in other regions. But I would check them out no matter where you live. They are very progressive, and were on the forefront of LGBTQ issues long before they were even up for discussion in the larger culture.
"He was not committing any crime."
Yes, it fully addresses it. You just did not like my answer.
Ups .. but nobody loves you !
LOL - you do have a talent for embodying the very thing you purport to criticize, and this post is an object lesson in melodramatic irony. The only deflection is yours, of course, since the point of my original post was to show the pointlessness of replacing one fundamentalist ideology with another. Instead of addressing that point, or responding to the question put to you, you instead think you're going to make a point about the lack of
Another explanation is that when resources are limited, and you have an army to field, you need a new generation and not genetic dead-ends. A gay couple takes the same resources to feed and house as a straight couple, but they don't produce soldiers. That may also explain the pork proscription. A pig. . .as omnivore. . .takes about the same amount and type of food as a person. Where you need every calorie to keep your society together, and defended, you can't waste them on gay people or pigs. Grazing animals turn grass into meat. That's why they're okay.
Mell is right, sorry.
One of the greatest achievements that the President had done and continues to do, despite humongous demonic obstacles created by disciples of Satan of your kind, is appointing god loving judges to save America from totally falling into hell..