Thats also my job in real life. But to be really funny here, my english needs to improve..
Well, it's gonna happen. Funny thing is, IF the dream of liberals were to come true and Trump were to leave office for whatever reason, who do ya think will become POTUS?????
Christianity is certainly the lesser of both evils for sure. Christians just get more obnoxious as they approach fundamentalism.
People without a sense of humor (or who can't recognize a joke, even if it's a really bad joke) should be accused of being prejudiced against irony (or "ironist," I suppose).
If she knows what will happen when captured, then it's her choice, but any sort of 'quota' for the armed forces is asinine.
Yeah, bill collectors could care less if you have found yourself or not....as long as they can find you.
Sensible way to take it forward.
He'll just say "I told her so", and expect to be let off
Yes, he did. He pure up stated slaves should obey thier masters as they obeyed god
D!ckwhisperer? Gotta meet her!
I'm not for sure where you can justify modern-day slavery coming from the church. But Christianity has a history of bringing society out of paganism and hospitals, orphanages and schools are the heritage of that movement.
It was a shotgun response directed mostly at your last sentence.
Define what is murder.
How often does it come up in ones daily life? My family know that I am an unbeliever, some of them are too, others are reasonably devout, no fanatics I am glad to say. I have attended grand kid's weddings in RC church, back yard atheist and kind of in between. All is grist to the mill.
Question: If the author of the gospel of Matthew was an eyewitness to events, why would he copy some 90% of the gospel of Mark, who was not an eyewitness, and at times use the same words? The entire reason for the invention of the "Q" as a source, was that the synoptic gospels were almost identical, and it was assumed that they had a common source, but most modern scholars reject that assumption now. The gospel of Luke has 55% of Matthew in his story, again, often in identical wording.
one more to go.
YOU are the claimant. YOU have the burden of proof. If you can't meet it, which obviously you can't, you are a fraud. If you try to pass YOUR burden of proof on to me which you are now attempting, you are a cheat. Put up or shut up!
They're saved. They're SAVED, Hurrah!! They're saved.
No, the initial reports were wrong. It's the Queen Mary tiara. She carried forget me nots in her bouquet which was Diana's fave flower.
Do words generally scare you?
I'm sensing another butt hurt lunatic leftist Berniebot. Run out of scented candles?
It won?t be lost
Lol! As usual corrupt Trump demonstrates his utter ignorance. I?d bet he actually believes that Canadians burned down the WH. Trump demonstrates his ignorance daily. Even worse, he doesn?t care to know the truth. Truth doesn?t matter to people who think they are above the law.
Trump's curruption is running against itself. Democrats should sell a positive message seeking turnout.
Again, using NARTH as a source when discussing the science of sexual orientation makes as much sense as using AIG in a discussion on the science of evolution, or WATTSUP as a source when discussing AGW.
I greatly support religious freedom. There is no reason not to. However you are never protected from my criticisms. If I disagree or want to voice a disagreement with a particular aspect of someone's theology I don't want it to be labelled as "hate speech". Disagreeing and hate are two different things.
Your selective outrage is duly noted...