So what IS the difference? Both of us are the "bag of chemicals". Your bag is the same as the atheist bag. You don't have any real difference from the atheist. There are theists and atheists that have no problem killing other human beings. So what is the difference in value? Atheists behave in the same manner as Christians, want pretty much the same things from their lives, are as good and charitable as are theists. One thing the atheist doesn't come in with is the prejudices and discriminations that the theist has.
I've already pointed out why your argument was wrong. You either believe in something or you don't. Babies can't believe in something they don't know. That makes them nonbelievers, someone that doesn't believe, or atheists.
Not many. Evolution has been taught in Christian colleges and universities for a century and they will continue to teach it. No one teaches creationist fantasies as science anywhere because not only is creation magic not science it isn't even a subject. ROFL! Have fun
the bowl in my goldfish tank, our closed system. which one were you talking about?
Not to mention the greenie weenie governments who refuse to allow refinery capacity to expand to meet demands...a lot of the cost is false shortage caused by government intervention in the supply demand dynamic.
"Strikes with a rod" not with the intention of killing.
Thank you. I'm not going to bash all gun owners. Like I said, I own guns myself. But it's high time to be responsible about it.
Times change. I thought the girlfriend test involved a movie, cutting a hole in the bottom of a popcorn bucket, and, nevermind.
I can say with confidence that pot leads to more M&Ms.
and they can if they want. Idiots are not a protected class.
It has made me very very nervous - especially as an immigrant. Many people don't seem to understand how offensive his attitude is towards immigrants, which I take personally even though I'm here legally.
You made the claim, can't you provide just one for discussion?
How is this idea immoral?
Insofar as religion claims to refer to eternal truths, it should not be considered credible without collaborative evidence.
No evidence at all.
Do you think anyone has explained to him the premise behind "Question Period" where the opposition intentionally tries to provoke a reaction out of you, and you have to know your stuff?
Again she never once claimed Native American as her race. She pointed out she, like tens of millions of other White Americans, have Native American ancestry. She never once used it as her race to get into school or to get hired.
So if YOU take the bible as literal truth, then is the earth flat?
Why is the labeling wrong when the label fits?